I got the most bizarre comment on the blog yesterday. Apparently I’m… a computer.
I’ve had one or two people tell me they think I’m a man before, but this is the first time I’ve been accused of being Robbie the Robot.
You can see it yourself here, but to save you the bother I’ll repeat it below:
“You just outed yourself as a fake. That computer generated voice has been available on various web sites for over a decade. This sucks. I really thought you were real”
Male Chastity Guide, Why He Wants You to Say ‘NO!’ PLUS the all-new How to Drive Your Man Insane with Desire — They’re BOTH FREE.
Oh, my… I’m not quite sure what kind of computers he’s been listening to, but if they take breaths between their words, then they’re pretty smart.
Still, this is just another example of someone seeing what they want to see, rather than seeing what’s actually there. A bit like the chap who emailed me yesterday asking me to “talk to” his wife-to-be and tell her he “needs to cum”.
Methinks he’s either telling porkies for his own titillation or he’s not been paying attention to what I say over and over and over again. Clue: she can’t make you wear the thing, my lad.
If you really don’t like it, take it off; and if you don’t take it off, then you must really like it (or, at least, like the alternative less).
Communication and ground rules are the foundational principles in BCWYWF and my free guide and that’s why I go on about them so much.
You know, I do SO love male chastity and the blog, and writing these emails… but the sheer amount of silliness does get tiring from time to time.
P.S. Check out my voice yourself and make your own mind up.
Next time maybe I’ll record a song. Any requests?
Discover the quick and easy way to get your wife to lock you in strict male chastity until your balls want to explode and you're begging for a release you just are NEVER going to get!
Just leave your details below, click the button... and I'll take care of the rest:
Back to Chastity, Male Chastity
Back to top of Introducing Sarah 2.0 (with realistic sounds)
Well, *I* know you’re not a robot. Although, frankly, when I hear your voice, I imagine you looking more like Amanda Donohoe. But maybe it’s the subject matter influencing my thinking.
Are you kidding, Tom?
My hair… well… John calls me “poodle”. ‘Nuff said.
x
Sarah
I think it’s your flawless reading of the passage, and constant reading speed that made him say that. It was done perfectly and to him that means robot.
If you are really concerned about this, I don’t think singing would help since your voice will sound different when singing. My suggestion would be to record a short interview with John, just a couple minutes. Ask a few questions and play off the cuff. You can still edit it for quality, but don’t be a perfectionist about it.
Well, we could. But it’s not a worry – this kind of thing always crops up from time to time, no matter what you do. I long ago took John’s advice not to wrestle with pigs — you both end up covered in shit, and the pig enjoys it.
Well, it was only a matter of time untill you were found out! I just wonder who is doing the T&D for John? Not a computer that can do that.You are so right lowering your standards to defend yourself to idiots is a no win. Take care, we all love you. B and I had a good laugh.
John has a computer-controlled Fleshlight, Richard
The only thing he’s got to do now is program it to do cook and clean…
If that voice is a robot, I want the robot. Can only begin to imagine what could happen. Really hope the technology IS getting that good
Honestly, with today’s technology its quite easy to fake the human voice and modify it to be unique…I’ve always admired your website and writing but have also thought from time to time that you are actually male Sara…Even the title of your post hints that the speech is not real…you clearly wrote “with realistic sounds”…kind of self defeating IMHO. If I had to weigh in a judgement…which I don’t…I’d say that I know that I don’t know the truth of the matter
As someone who knows just a tiny bit about marketing…I’d say that controversy sells and that any press is good press…well done
I’ve done some work with TTS stuff before and the following URLs will give an example of what’s out there…
http://www.ispeech.org/text.to.speech.demo.php
https://acapela-box.com/AcaBox/index.php
In any case…keep on keeping on
(rolls eyes) Quite. And a truth I can never prove so won’t even bother trying.
It’s like the Fundies who claim T-Rex had large fangs to eat coconuts in the Garden of Eden rather than face the fact of evolution.
No amount of photos, video or audio will convince anyone who chooses to believe whatever they choose to believe. And even if I did prove all that, it still doesn’t prove I write the blog or the books or anything else.
And even if someone took up station by my desk and watched me write everything, that doesn’t prove I wrote anything before they got there; and to the other foil-hats it doesn’t prove my new observers, themselves, are not now “in” on the “conspiracy”.
So, this is why I don’t bother.
Incidentally, the title was written in irony.
Ugh, I don’t freaking believe this.
Lud, you are an ass. There are not hordes of men wondering if Sarah is a real woman.
However, in the interest of ending this dispute, I can tell you that I know Sarah and John from a certain electronic social network, and unless they have fabricated a couple of thousand other contacts for the sake of verisimilitude, then I can only conclude that they are a real couple, and that Sarah (who, unfortunately, does *not* look like Amanda Donohoe) is a real woman.
Of course, now you have to believe that *I* am a real person, and am not making this up.
Thomasina, perhaps?
BTW, Lud, Tom has also heard a song I recorded. I’m sure he’ll confirm this in due course. But, of course, no one’s seen Tom’s birth-certificate, either. He could be Kenyan, you know.
I have deleted the rest of your comment because you are being offensive.
And you don’t have the right to an opinion on my blog. You have the privilege if I allow it — I pay for it, and I make the rules. And being rude and disrespectful to me is not something I put up with. You’re now moderated, and if you continue being rude, I’ll get John to block you from the site altogether.
But you did say this:
“4. I’ve been receiving your emails for about a year, however I admit I don’t read each one word for word, not do I listen to every link to an MP3 that comes to my inbox”
So, let me get this straight: the fact the evidence is already out there is not good enough? You want me to dish it all up to you? A whole year freeloading off my work, and you now want more from me because you’re too lazy to find it yourself?
No. Fuck off, you offensive twit.
Everything you need has already been sent to you on March 9th — too fucking bad if you didn’t listen to it.
Go away, Lud,
You’re really not welcome here.
Nothing to talk about, Lud.
The evidence is out there. Someone might be kind enough to send it to you. I’m not going to.
I’ve deleted the offensive parts of your comment.
Go away.
You are not welcome.
Update: Lud has been banned. He’s repeatedly tried to send more comments from proxy servers. If it continues, I’ll have no choice but to post his email here, as well as his IP address. I’ve deleted his comments because, as John has just pointed out to me, he thrives on attention.
Second update: this person has tried repeatedly to post and is now, in my opinion, giving me reason to think my personal safety could be compromised. He is using threatening, aggressive and abusive language in his comments to me. So for now, I’ve closed off all comments on the blog. If he sends me any kind of personal message either by email or through the blog, as per my clearly posted rules, I reserve the right to post it anywhere I see fit in its entirety. By sending me any such message he is giving me permission to do this.